This blog focuses on issues and solutions to racism, culture, cultural difference(s), and social injustice(s) for Black and Hispanic students as they develop in families, schools, and communities. RACE (Racism, Achievement, Change, Equity) is a forum for exposing injustices, but also sharing stories, examples, practices, ideas, theories, models, and research for change.

Posts tagged ‘gifted education’

Discrimination in Gifted Education — Lessons Learned to Desegregate Gifted Education!u-46-discrimination-case/cd9w

Illinois School District Guilty of Discriminating Against Hispanic and Black Students



On July 11, 2013, Illinois Federal District Court Judge Robert Gettleman issued a decision holding that District U-46 (Elgin) discriminated against Hispanic and Black students in the district’s gifted program until at least 2009. Despite the over 40% of Hispanic students in the school district, in most years, they were only 2% of the gifted programs.


Specifically, the Court found the district discriminated against Hispanic students who had exited from the district’s bilingual program by segregating them into a separate gifted program, not allowing them to be in classes with gifted White students. Judge Gettlemen’s decision renewed the Brown v. Board of Education (1954) principle that ‘separate is inherently unequal’.


The Court also found that the policies, procedures and instruments used by the district to screen and identify gifted students resulted in a “serious disparate impact” on Hispanic and Black students. I, Donna Y. Ford, PhD., the Plaintiff’s expert witness in the case, urge all school districts to learn from the case and eliminate barriers to gifted education. I can be reached at


For a copy of the opinion, click here

Transcending Race in Gifted Programs: Are We There Yet?

Transcending Race in Gifted Programs: Are We There Yet?

By Joy Lawson Davis, EdD

In a meeting with a group of colleagues last fall, I was reminded that discussing the  “achievement gap” can sometimes be a distraction. As a distraction, it often keeps us from focusing on issues that are more prevalent and more difficult to talk about. When we discuss “gaps” we refer to voids, vacuums, a space where something is missing. As such we infer that something has to be placed into the void for it to be “whole” or “complete.” In this manner, we tend to blame the “victim” for the void.

In teaching others about giftedness and diversity, I capture a host of conditions under the label of “challenges.”  Some see the use of the term “challenges” as negative. My intent is not to draw attention to the negatives, but to help my audiences understand the very real and persistent problems faced by gifted students of color in our schools and communities.  One of the persistent problems or challenges is racial discrimination. Racism is deeply rooted in the fabric of American society. It is a challenging and difficult concept to discuss, reckon with, and to transcend. To “transcend” implies that we have overcome, risen above, surmounted, and defeated a condition, situation, or barrier. to transcend race as a barrier in gifted education we must first recognize and honestly deal with the barrier for what it is. Like an enemy who has remained an undefeated foe, racism in our schools and society persists and its effects are long term and deeply damaging.

Last spring, the National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC) held a national summit on “Promising Low Income” learners. This summit focused on exemplary programs and practices as well as areas needing continuing research that address the needs of high-ability students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. I attended the summit and served as a responder. The summit panels and presenters were an impressive array of individuals from across the nation who conduct research and provide services to a broad group of gifted students who have high potential but often lack the resources needed to fully develop that potential.  The summit’s work has been well received nationwide. For more information, visit NAGC’s Website.

Too often, however, as a field, we are hesitant to address the impact of racial discrimination in gifted education apart from income discrimination. Almost weekly reports are released which speak to the very obvious and painful effects of racial discrimination exacted upon African Americans in particular, in this country. Racial discrimination across educational settings is real. African American (and Hispanic) students are disproportionately identified for special education at alarming rates; they are the students also most likely to be suspended, expelled, and to dropout  from school nationwide. These students are also the least likely to take and perform well on Advanced Placement (AP) tests nationwide.  Taken together, these conditions are causing astronomical damage to our students, families, communities, and our nation. The issues and concerns of racially and/or ethnically diverse students must be addressed separate and apart from low-income students to effectively examine the causes and then, to effectively develop long-term solutions.

Below are vignettes (true stories) describing the effects of racism on two African-American students identified as gifted.  While the examples are those of Black students, I also suggest that Hispanic, first-generation immigrant, and other under-served gifted learners also face similar challenges in schools and programs not because of their lack of high potential, but more often because of the ethnic group or race.

Vignette #1-

You’re too black to be in the gifted program! Last year, in preparation for a new manuscript, I interviewed and collected stories from families of many different cultural backgrounds and different types of geographic communities from across the nation. One such story is that of an African-American single mother living in a rural community raising a very bright high schooler who was identified as gifted in elementary school. In this mother’s story, she tells about experiences her son has had with peer groups. He has two different peer groups. The predominately White and Asian peer group in the gifted program and his Black peer group who are not identified as gifted and do not take the advanced level courses that he does. The mother described how on more than one occasion, her son was accused of being “too black” to be in the gifted program. Unlike the “acting white” phenomenon that research suggests some black students are accused of, in this young man’s case he had repeatedly been accused by peers from both the gifted group and outside of gifted class group of being “too black.” The declarative statement was “You’re too black; you can’t be gifted!” Being too black, the mother surmised, must have meant that he expressed himself as “black”;  he was proud of being black and had close relationships with black students who were among his social and athletic peer group and but not in the gifted program, taking the same classes. With strong support from his family, intrinsic motivation, and commitment to succeed despite the odds, this young man has been successful. But his success has not been without its share of challenges, mostly from trying to convince students and even some adults in his environment, that it is possible for him to be black and gifted at the same time. (For a new look at why the ‘acting white’ theory has been misused and doesn’t always hold true, see Rhymes, E.  Acting White? African American Students and Education.)


Vignette #2-

Are you sure you belong here? In 2011, I had the pleasure of meeting a physician in the airport before departing for a flight. This woman was stately, well-dressed with a very pleasant demeanor. As we talked, I shared my line of work with her, and she was pleased to hear about it. She actually appeared glad to have someone to tell her story. She went on to tell me that she was a native of an African nation and that her two daughters attended the local public schools. She continued by sharing situations her own daughters had experienced in educational settings wherein they were blatantly discriminated against by students and teachers. One story was particularly alarming to me. She had paid well for her daughter to attend a summer residential program for gifted students in science in a nearby state. As any good parent would, this mother said she did her research and believed the program to be an exceptional one, where her daughter could learn and be comfortable as a gifted student. Her daughter loves science, so she thought this would be an excellent opportunity for summer enrichment. After attending class on the first day, her daughter called home very distressed. She told her mother that some of her classmates asked, “Are you sure you belong here?” She reported the boys’ comments to the instructor, and he, too, looked at her as if perhaps her peers were correct and said nothing to challenge the boys’ assumption or correct them. The classmates and the instructor were all white male. The mother, a first-generation immigrant, was appalled by the comments and behavior, but not unprepared. She told me that she “took care of it” by contacting the program director and sharing the account, and also expressing her displeasure in such blatant bias on the part of the students, but even more so, the instructor’s lack of sensitivity and professionalism in the face of a very troubling situation. {See Henfield, Washington & Owens article entitled To be or Not to be Gifted? for a detailed and multi-facted discussion about the challenges faced by contemporary black youth in gifted programs}.

 These stories are just a sample of other real-life occurrences faced by gifted children of color on a regular basis. It is a sad commentary on our institutions when,  in the 21st century, even those students identified as gifted and participating in gifted programs are devalued and discriminated against simply because of their race. If this is the case with those identified, what does this suggest about the numbers of students who we have yet to be recognized and served in gifted and advanced learner programs?

It will take a committed effort for all stakeholders in gifted education, researchers, educators, civic leaders, advocates, policymakers, and families to come together to put an end to the blatant discrimination practices that are causing so many students to suffer, not because there’s a “void” or “gap” in their potential or performance, but simply because of who they are. As a condition of development, giftedness knows no race.

For us to transcend racial discrimination, we must first be willing to recognize it and then we can address it. Evidence-based practices and exemplary programs that demonstrate the benefits of cultural competency, multicultural pedagogy, and cultural sensitivity are readily available, and experts in all of these areas abound. To ensure that gifted education program services are effectively and appropriately serving all gifted learners, we must address the presence and impact of racism in gifted education and use all of the tools at our disposable to create better conditions. Gifted children and youth from all ethnic and racial backgrounds are counting on us to discover their strengths, provide nurturance for development of their special interests, and most importantly do our part to shape a transcendent world of true acceptance of the ideals, legacies, and the value of all ethnic groups. In doing so, we stand a better chance of ensuring  that our gifted students will be healthy, fulfilled, productive and do their part to positively contribute to their communities and our nation’s future. 


Recommended reading:

Blum, L. (2012, Nov/Dec). Five things high school students should know about race. Downloaded from

Henfield, M.S., Washington, A.R., Owens, D. (2010) To be or not to be gifted. Gifted Child Today 32(2), 17-25. Downloaded from

Olszewski-Kubilius, P. & Clarenbach, J (2012). Unlocking Emergent Talent: Supporting High Achievement of Low-Income, High-Ability Students. A publication of the National Association for Gifted Children. Supported by the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.

Rhymes, E. (2004, July). Acting White? African American students and education. Downloaded from

– See more at:


Colorblind gifted

Colblind gifted

this is so naive and colorblind….and out of touch and insensitive… and !!!


beware of the ill-informed

beware of the ill-informed

I understand and appreciate the notion of ‘academic triage’; however, your overall argument is weak and out of touch with reality — real issues. You should delete this post, do your ‘homework’ and start anew… This is a very insensitive and troubling entry…. shame on you for ignoring and trivializing decades of research!


When White stud…

When White students outperform Black students in school and on tests, too many Whites interpret this as their being genetically superior. What is their interpretation when Asian students outperform White students in school and on tests? Cultural differences. When the shoe is on the other foot…. Let me hear from you.

gifted, resilient, yet more challenges…

%d bloggers like this: